Hoteller med alt inklusive i Rumænien

"Nice and quiet hotel, super friendly staff"

"Dejligt rummeligt værelse. Rilidtbselvom trafik udenfor. Dog lidt varm."

"Fantastisk ophold, lækkert værelse, sødt og imødekommende personale De sendte bobler og dessert til vores værelse på min fødselsdag og det hele var bare gennemført."

"Really nice and helpful staff. Well located for exploring the city."

"De laver fin mad på hotellet Det var godt det tilbud jeg købte Det trækker dog lidt ned at det ikke var muligt at få en alkoholfri drikkevarer i stedet for den øl der var med i prisen Men meget god mad til god pris "

"Excellent location. -Close to the metro station -Bars and restaurants just around the corner. And, special thank you for Maria and Gabriela for the great service and being helpful at the reception!"

"Det var et dejligt nyt og moderne hotel med alt hvad jeg havde brug for - og til en meget fordelagtig pris. Hotellet ligger ret højt i forhold til byen, Jeg havde bedt om et værelse højt oppe med god udsigt over byen mod sydøst, og det blev imødekommet. Dag og nat kunne jeg således at nyde udsigten over hele byen og se bl.a. helt over til nordsiden af det gigantiske parlamentspalads. "

"Fint og effektivt"

"Booked for 4 nights. The location was very good, the service at the reception was great, the rooms are excellent - very comfortable beds, great air conditioning, everything you need is there. The cleanliness was top notch. The hotel is not without faults, though: two of the 4 lifts were not working, so the waiting time for one was between 5 and 10 minutes each time. The bartender at the lobby bar was downright rude when it came to paying, demanding a tip (common practice in Romania, but the way he demanded it was unpleasant). The rooms allow people to smoke on the balcony, so if you stay higher up - you get all the cigarette smoke in the room. Bathrooms have no toilet brushes or bath plugs. The pool balcony was closed, even though the pool itself was open. Overall, the hotel is good - but it’s a 4 star experience rather than 5."